Interesting article on covid

This section is for general debates and discussions (excluding politics) with other forum members. Those wishing to enter into political dialogue with fellow members please use the Politics section below.

Everybody is entitled to their own views whether you agree or disagree. Please respect other forum members views and be courteous at all times. Bullying or abusing other forum members will not be tolerated.

Advertisement

jimny1
Posts: 1478
Joined: 02 Dec 2019 23:03

Re: Interesting article on covid

#2

Post: # 7426Post jimny1 »

Are we getting closer to the truth ?
https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/07/ ... wr_PigzbIU
SparePart
Posts: 17
Joined: 12 Jul 2020 11:03

Re: Interesting article on covid

#3

Post: # 7434Post SparePart »

The truth is plain. Did you know there was an american drug company paying $3.2m for the Wuhan Labs research ?

The Lab was paid to research novel coronaviruses from the Wuhan Cave bats - probably as potential bio weapon - or the chinese were doing such reserach on the side anyway. The lab has an appalling record of bio-security and had previously allowed SARS to escape TWICE. IMHO what happened is clear - the let the virus out by sheer incompetence and bad security, the chinese, not ones to waste a good opportunity, locked down THEIR country to stop the spread but thought "Oh well lets spread it round the west to test it and see how well it spreads and how much damage we can do" and let all he infected foreigners fly home to spread it for them. It was deliberate and opportunistic.
jimny1
Posts: 1478
Joined: 02 Dec 2019 23:03

Re: Interesting article on covid

#4

Post: # 7435Post jimny1 »

If proven they should be charged with mass genocide or at the least biological warfare
But with the world in chinas pocket i doubt this would ever happen
Economic sanctions would probably be the worst they would get as a punishment , and that would not last long with countries depending on them for cheap goods
And the only answer to this would be to bring manufacturing back to the home countries regardless of the extra cost, an extra trillion here or there would not make a difference considering the existing debt
SparePart
Posts: 17
Joined: 12 Jul 2020 11:03

Re: Interesting article on covid

#5

Post: # 7436Post SparePart »

well yes, shorten the supply lines become more self reliant on essentials. I also dont think its a good idea foriegners own vast chucks of our countries infrastructure. It can possibly be in our national security interest, for example, the French Government basically owns our electricity grid, the Dutch own the largest chemical company, Qinetiq, the former Defence Research establishment is owned by the americans. We need to own our own infrastructure.
paulja
Posts: 577
Joined: 03 Dec 2019 19:02

Re: Interesting article on covid

#6

Post: # 7439Post paulja »

SparePart wrote: 12 Jul 2020 20:21 The truth is plain. Did you know there was an american drug company paying $3.2m for the Wuhan Labs research ?

Yet another twist on facts. That statement like many conspiracies is only partly true and is then twisted to suit what some want to believe.

No American drug company was paying for such research.

It was the US government. And it has been doing so since 2014 for specific reasons.


SparePart wrote: 12 Jul 2020 20:21 the chinese, not ones to waste a good opportunity, locked down THEIR country to stop the spread but thought "Oh well lets spread it round the west to test it and see how well it spreads and how much damage we can do" and let all he infected foreigners fly home to spread it for them. It was deliberate and opportunistic.
And nothing stopped the rest of the world locking down and banning Chinese or anyone in China returning home the minute it happened in China either as opposed to waiting 2 months or longer. There is the incompetence.

As for letting the infected foreigners fly home, do you not remember all the Brits complaining that they were prevented from travelling at the time, could not get to airports because the lockdown would not allow them. The UK government had to lay on special transport to get them to the airport and then charter special flights.
So that was not deliberate or opportunistic by the Chinese.
paulja
Posts: 577
Joined: 03 Dec 2019 19:02

Re: Interesting article on covid

#7

Post: # 7440Post paulja »

An article with lots of supposition, alleged, rumoured etc etc.

It mentions 2 Chinese students murdered........

And here is what the police say. And they were not students either.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co ... a-52568716
jimny1
Posts: 1478
Joined: 02 Dec 2019 23:03

Re: Interesting article on covid

#8

Post: # 7445Post jimny1 »

Jimbo i think the link of mine you quoted is not the one you meant to post, its from earth.com
The article is about covid damaging heart cells

I read the second article about professors death and its a bit suspicious, the fact Hao Gu shot him then killed himself, why ?
If it was just a lovers tiff its all a bit extreme and convenient
If he didnt work for a lab and wasnt quote " on the verge of making very significant findings towards understanding the cellular mechanisms of Covid-19 infection ", then ok its a possibility this happened the way the police said, but considering whats at stake and if he had important information about covid production , its effects and if it had been leaked , then even a bumbling clouseau would have thought something wrong and looked further into it
The fact that china has a history of lying and covering things up, the same as all other governments, usa, russia and the uk etc etc , then whos to say it wasnt a staged execution, even by the USA wanting it to be associated to china
When you think how Georgi Markov was killed by the russians in london , like something out of a bond movie, then nothing seems too far fetched
Who knows
SparePart
Posts: 17
Joined: 12 Jul 2020 11:03

Re: Interesting article on covid

#9

Post: # 7446Post SparePart »

Jimbo wrote: 13 Jul 2020 07:50
SparePart wrote: 12 Jul 2020 20:21 The truth is plain. Did you know there was an american drug company paying $3.2m for the Wuhan Labs research ?

Yet another twist on facts. That statement like many conspiracies is only partly true and is then twisted to suit what some want to believe.

No American drug company was paying for such research.

Well, i do my research, so i disagree (in a friendly way :D )

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandso ... coronaviru

"The U.S. government has suddenly terminated funding for a years-long research project in China that many experts say is vital to preventing the next major coronavirus outbreak.

The project was run by a U.S. nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance. it exists as described https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/

For more than a decade, the group has been sending teams to China to trap bats, collect samples of their blood, saliva and feces, and then check those samples for new coronaviruses that could spark the next global pandemic. "


The American Company Gliead Sciences owned the patent on Resmdesivir, the drug it developed to fight SARS, but never got used, and was part of Ecohealth Alliance, funding Wuhan to find other novel corona viruses to use its patent drug on. The Wuhan scientists, upon finding COVID was transmissible by air to humans, tried to patent the use of Remsdesivir on COVID, before telling Gilelad of its finding, which tho legal is highly immoral, unethical and professionally questionable - Gilead had the right to test the drug on COVID first. The chinese tried to 'steal the base', as the americans say

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remdesivir

I always check my facts before posting. And there are lost of contradictory facts and denials. But the fact Gilead DOES own the patent and IS part of Ecohealth shows the story must be true. And the fact several official bodies are goiing to great lengths to deny it shows thers a coverup going on. One thing ive learned after 66 years on this planet is when a Government Official categorically denies something, you can bet sure as eggs is eggs hes lying. Weighing up all ive read (and ive read a LOT on this from many sources) Ill stand by my post :D
paulja
Posts: 577
Joined: 03 Dec 2019 19:02

Re: Interesting article on covid

#10

Post: # 7452Post paulja »

As I said and your new links confirm.

It was not as suggested in your original post a drug company providing the funds.

Taken from your link:

the National Institutes of Health, or NIH — which was providing the grant for the project — notified EcoHealth Alliance that the money was being canceled.

That is Government funding. The grant paid by the government and cancelled by the government.

Advertisement

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in